What might they have meant when they had said that there are further variables in the full ad URL required for their product to effectively check the ad's statistics? 
That's what has me stumped.

   
    If anyone is willing to kindly furnish me with the full ad URL from on my web page it would be highly appreciated. http://www.bleu-wizard.com/dinosaur I do intend to read up on HTML after this coming Fall semester. You all have my esteem and gratitude for all of your help so far. Currently I am saving my money to purchase books otherwise I would purchase some books on HTML right now. My goal is to hopefully have the full ad URL prior to August 25th. That is when I will be moving into my dorm room. Again any further assistance in this matter would be highly appreciated. 

    Please clarify what you meant. Are you saying that without asking google for the full ad URL that there is no other way whatsoever to find out what it is? With the current partial ad URL Stat Checker has only been giving me an "Error, please input full URL" message. Also if anyone else can furnish me with the full ad URL please do so. 

    I am aware that Google Adwords displays statistics in multiple different categories. What I want to do is to compare statistics between the stats page in my Google Adwords account and the ad's statistics as determined by Stat Checker. That is why I am in search of the full ad HTML to input into Stat Checker. Also I have kindly removed the picture of blue hills that was in question. 

    Still it would be nice if I were able to obtain the full ad URL (including the ad HTML plus the values at the end of the ad URL interpolated such as win_name, tref etc.) for the purpose of inputting it into Stat Checker so that I could know for sure. 

Actually, it's more that most of us do not know enough about the "Stat Checker" program that DoctorLight is trying to use in conjunction with his Advertiser's ads

Here's his original thread which this thread had continued from:

http://www.lunarforums.com/forum/index.php?topic=33936.0

But, evidently, "yes" we do not know enough about the "Stat Checker" software program to give any useful help with that (but we have several times asked for a link to where he purchased that program from, so we could try to help him better, but none was provided) ... but Members here were trying their best to help him understand that with some types of ad programs that he's trying to use the "Stat Checker" program with, he might not be able to use an img tag.

I can see how both DoctorLight and Members can become frustrated when trying to provide help and receive help, and I do apologize to DoctorLight if I had inferred to him (by linking to those Google links) as not knowing how to create an image tag, but I assure you, my intention was not that of mocking him ... I truly thought he did not know this info (especially based on this post in that other thread: http://www.lunarforums.com/forum/index.php?topic=33936.msg254964#msg254964)

Anyway, I don't believe this is really a case of people not being honest about their limited knowledge (because many of us in the other thread have already confessed that we do not know anything about the "Stat Checker" program  ), but it is definitely obvious that we cannot help DoctorLight any further with this and the only ones who can give him any sort of answer are those who are using the "Stat Checker" program with those type ads, or the makers of "Stat Checker" themselves.

P.S. You really can't blame too much those who wanted to still try to offer some sort of help or understanding, though. Otherwise, no one would be responding to his posts at all, and would that then be better? 

Samson,

As Leighsww & Oxsley have pointed out, there are many users here who have taken the time to explain details of the situation and assist in finding a solution. At times it appears that a lack of knowledge is resulting in questions being asked that do not make sense to those with more experience. When this happens, attempts are made to both explain/teach about the issue and ask for clarification to learn more about what is going on in an attempt to answer the question. We all started out from a point of not knowing things and so we take the time to offer assistance because we want to help others. When we read the question, we realize that there is something "missing" that prevents an answer from being found. It isn't that we can't answer the question, but rather that the question does not make sense to it based on our experience/knowledge of HTML, web design, etc. and although we would like to help we need more information...

Also, as I (and others) pointed out in other threads (and perhaps earlier in this one) the web pages DoctorLight has created are not in proper HTML format (they do not have a .html extension (or any extension for that matter), do not contain <HTML> tags, etc. The lack of an extension actually results in the page loading as plain text in many browsers rather than an HTML page. (Internet Explorer treats everything as HTML unless told otherwise, but other browsers such as FF do not. So, when I go his site I see the HTML source code for the page rather than it displaying as intended.) Perhaps some might interpret this as criticism or moking, but I take it as an attempt to try and explain to someone how to improve their pages while explaining both how and why it should be done.

In other matters, after switching to IE and hitting reload several times, I finally got "part" of what I was looking for... the URL for two different ads

The first URL was:

and the second was:

Note that these two ads both point to google (ie googlesyndication.com). So clicking on either ad would result in a GET request going to Google's servers. I'm not sure how Stat Checker could track this click since there is no information being sent to DoctorLight's server when the link is clicked. Since no information is sent to DoctorLight's server, I can not see how Stat Checker would even know it was clicked. Also, this means that each "ad" would have a separate URL/tag rather than their being 1 URL/tag for all ads. Also, note that this links do not contain the missing paramters to which DoctorLight keeps referring. I still do not know what the names of those parameters are since they are not standard to HTML, but rather are going to be specific to Stat Checker or something else DoctorLight is using. Since DoctorLight can not (or at least has not) provided this information, it is hard to assist. We would all like to help, and are trying to get the information from DoctorLight that we need to try and answer the questions, but so far have been rather unsuccessful in our attempts.

Again, it really seems that stat checker is not designed to track dynamic ads which are being displayed from another site. Rather, it would be used to track incoming links (ie clicks on ads from other websites to DoctorLight's website) or clicks on ads that actually link to DoctorLight's site in some way. Currently, the ads being shown (ie the Google Ads, and the bidvertiser ads before) do not link to DoctorLight's site, so I do not think Stat Checker will be appropriate for tracking them. But, as others have noted, without more information on Stat Checker, it is hard to say...

Rowan Edit: changed quote to code to stop false ad clicks, thanks Leighsww
GMTurner Edit: modified the URLs so that they are shorter and even less clickable, but still show some of the differences between them...