Hello,
This is an awfully dismissive and flippant statement. The point is I signed up and tested with remote SQL access. I wouldn't have gone live here (wouldn't have even gotten past the first day of testing) without remote SQL access. Now I'm live, and one of the most important features for the management has been taken away. If lunar hadn't screwed up I wouldn't be making this choice.
I apologize, if it sounded like that, there was no such intention. Remote access to MSSQL from Internet is disabled on all MSSQL servers setup for shared accounts for security purposes and, when it was found that it is not on the server you use, this was fixed.
myLittleAdmin is useless. I have a 260,000 record product table. Lets say I want to update prices and quantity for a small subset of 200 of those 260,000. With remote access I just pull up SQL server management, query the table with the set name to pull up those 200 and it takes only as long as it takes me to retype the price and quantity for each record. (about 1.5 seconds per record)
With myLittleAdmin, I have to first run a query to get the specific product ID (because when you use a select query your responses are read only. No modification allowed) After getting the specific product ID I have to write Update SQL code making sure I get field names and syntax right. I then have to do this 200 times. It takes at least 30 seconds per record (thats being conservative). I'll get nothing done. (and I've gotten nothing done over the past 2 weeks)
A lot of scripts for catalogues have a feature to search items by some characteristic for modification. If your example is the only operation you need to have remote MSSQL access for, did you consider realizing the same feature for your site as this appears to be a cheaper solution than upgrading or moving and will allow you to do the modification from any computer even without MSSQL management software as well as program the most frequent updates for quick lunch.