quote:
But, again, would the browser not think that it's just getting an audio file attached to a web page, therefore downloading to temp/cache, and executing?
That was somnewhat wrong but the rest of your assumption is correct.
Good eye webman
Bastard

You got me..
I was looking, of course, from my set of mind that i have downloaded the latest patches via critical updates. Here is what happens to usecure unpatched IE.
NIMDA looks for IIS web servers suffering from the Unicode Directory Traversal vulnerability. It attempts to alter the contents of pages on such servers, hunting for the following filenames:
index.html
index.htm
index.asp
readme.html
readme.htm
readme.asp
main.html
main.htm
main.asp
default.html
default.htm
default.asp
If it finds one of the above files on the web server the virus attempts to alter the contents of the file, adding a section of malicious Javascript code to the end of the file.
If the website is then browsed by a user with an
insecure version of Internet Explorer, (UNPATCHED) the malicious code
automatically downloads a file called readme.eml onto the user's computer - which is then executed, forwarding the virus once more.
Hehe so instead, I STAND CORRECTED. Yes average ususpecting user would have been infected by simply viewing the site whose servers were infected
Nice eye and props to you
[ November 14, 2001: Message edited by: Santos ]