You don't use objects for everything, especially if there is a legitimate need for many places to access simple data items. However, for data which can be thought of as a distinct unit, it can be advantageous to hide (encapsulate) the data in an object. If no one else has any business looking at or acting on the data directly (not via its methods), an object is good for hiding the data. Examples might include lists, queues, buffers, stacks, and trees. With objects, you retain the right to change the internal data types and layouts, and since no other code knows anything about the object's innards, they don't require any updating upon a change. Besides the listed data groups, there are other things which lend themselves well to objects, such as windows, groups and elements within windows (e.g., a radio button group or a pull-down list), and other access methods (e.g., an interface to a piece of hardware).

An added advantage to an object is that you don't have to explicitly pass around multiple separate pieces of data to functions that operate on it. Also, classes can be set up to inherit data and methods from a parent, which can be an advantage if done in a reasonable manner.

I'm not sure what the point of doing "spam" like this would be if there are no links to other sites, and while the point of many such questions is puzzling, I have been having mercy upon such posters and giving them the benefit of the doubt. Maybe they are just newbies (or non-English speakers) who just don't know how to frame a reasonable question, and end up asking something that sounds stupid to comp sci pros. Anyway, if he/she/it doesn't follow up, I'll have to agree that they're not doing anything useful and can be ignored.

Incidentally, I do report spam to the moderator(s) on an almost daily basis, and sometimes it's removed.

I got a nice PM from MichaelT telling me that they do pay attention to spam reports, but are sometimes too busy to get to them right away. They apparently don't have any staff dedicated to moderating the forum, but the help desk/sysadmins chip in on a time-available basis. In that case, the best we can do is report spam as we see it and be patient. I try to wait a few days before reporting obvious spam a second time, or if it could be considered a borderline case, accept that they didn't see it as spam (at least, bad enough to remove or edit it).