Web Hosting Forum | Lunarpages

Author Topic: Lunarpages Speed Test  (Read 135863 times)

Offline wld

  • DNS n00b
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #60 on: May 04, 2006, 02:22:48 AM »
Code: [Select]

[twizzler]$ wget www.lunarpages.com/speedtest/data100MB.zip
--03:20:40--  http://www.lunarpages.com/speedtest/data100MB.zip
           => `data100MB.zip.2'
Resolving www.lunarpages.com... 209.200.229.4
Connecting to www.lunarpages.com[209.200.229.4]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104,858,112 [application/zip]

100%[====================================>] 104,858,112    9.11M/s    ETA 00:00

03:20:50 (9.64 MB/s) - `data100MB.zip.2' saved [104858112/104858112]
from my server @ REMOVED.com... not bad, as i get 200kb/s from servers in The Netherlands (www2.versatel.nl/100mb.bin)
« Last Edit: August 13, 2006, 07:31:01 AM by JamesG »

Offline ErraticAssassin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #61 on: May 10, 2006, 11:53:40 AM »
I got an average of around 780 KBps (=6240 kbps) from the DS3 line here at work for the 100 MB file.  4 MB every 5 seconds... not too shabby.  8-)

Offline ninjaweb

  • Space Explorer
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #62 on: May 20, 2006, 09:08:13 AM »
I'm from Italy and with a 4Mbit download ADSL connection I raised the 260 kb/s.
Usually that kind of line raises the 520/530 kb/s.

Similar speed for a file on one of my site hosted in US.

Maybe it's because I'm in Italy, and the street is so far  :)

Offline StephanieŽ

  • Master Jedi
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #63 on: August 13, 2006, 07:36:23 AM »
Code: [Select]
root@demon2 [~]# wget www.lunarpages.com/speedtest/data100MB.zip
--08:23:50--  http://www.lunarpages.com/speedtest/data100MB.zip
           => `data100MB.zip'
Resolving www.lunarpages.com... 209.200.229.4
Connecting to www.lunarpages.com|209.200.229.4|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104,858,112 (100M) [application/zip]

100%[===================================================================>] 104,858,112   10.97M/s    ETA 00:00

08:24:00 (9.41 MB/s) - `data100MB.zip' saved [104858112/104858112]
:notme:

Offline DSB

  • Computer Nerd
  • Jabba the Hutt
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
  • Programmer of things...
    • b-a-k-e-r.com
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #64 on: August 16, 2006, 12:30:35 AM »
You got a smite for that one!   :whip:

Offline TWebMan

  • Quantum Encyclopedia Writer
  • *****
  • Posts: 3054
    • Take charge of your site
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #65 on: September 10, 2006, 10:43:19 PM »
Steph, why so slow?  That network needs to be checked.
"Computers cause people to make more mistakes than any other invention in history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."  - Unknown
"Liberty of any kind is seldom lost all at once." - D. Hume
Every day is an Ode to Joy
The planet will be fine... and so will your site

Offline BryanJames

  • A Usually Constant Object
  • Pong! (the videogame) Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 28
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #66 on: September 29, 2006, 11:06:07 PM »
 :hypno:

i just tested with the 100MB   was running 1700KB/sec for about five seconds then slowly went down and is stable around 750 KB/sec


1. location of yourself in relation to the server.

Jonesboro Ga

2. location of yourself to nearest ISP hub

says riverdale first hop from where my modem connects to, so that it about 10 to 15 miles.

3. # of other customers on that hub on at the same time.

Probably not many, it is late at night now.

4. # of hops between yourself and the server.

traceroute to lunarpages.com (209.200.237.7), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  73.61.232.1 (73.61.232.1)  6.873 ms  7.474 ms  5.889 ms
 2  GE-1-1-ur01.C3riverdale.ga.atlanta.comcast.net (68.86.108.217)  7.649 ms  6.       109 ms  6.251 ms
15  plutoclone.lunarservers.com (209.200.237.7)  73.600 ms  70.899 ms  71.864 ms

5. processor, and Harddrive speeds (minor in most cases, however there very noticeable differences can occur between a Pentium II 350MHz/256 SDRAM and a Pentium 4 2.8GHz/1Gb DDR in relation to download speeds obtained)

quad xeon pent III 500mhz

6. processes running on the system at the same time.

Tasks:  89 total,   1 running,  88 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s): 14.2% us,  5.3% sy,  0.0% ni, 80.4% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   1035624k total,  1019792k used,    15832k free,    35620k buffers
Swap:  1020116k total,       64k used,  1020052k free,   829648k cached

RandyT

  • Guest
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #67 on: September 29, 2006, 11:09:30 PM »
That's impressive Bryan. That`s faster than I can play  :harp:

Also glad you have 0 zombies, heh !

RandyT

Offline winUSD

  • Spacescooter Operator
  • *****
  • Posts: 43
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #68 on: November 18, 2006, 10:52:45 AM »
I down 5M file , 500 to 300  to 100 to 40 k/sec  , with  2 min 20 sec.

Offline Amfortas

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #69 on: March 06, 2007, 02:19:32 PM »
Not bad at all.  I d/led the 100MB file and the average speed was around 980KBps.

darkwolf

  • Guest
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #70 on: March 08, 2007, 11:10:02 PM »
Eh, lots of things make a difference.

Im pulling on average for the for the 100MB file around 1.05MB/sec.

Of course I am in nevada, and dont think im to far from either datacenter.

Connection is a 10 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up.

This is on a AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Dont ask about my cable bill lmao

Offline MetalHead

  • Trekkie
  • **
  • Posts: 18
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #71 on: March 17, 2007, 02:03:47 AM »
Hi!
I get max DL rate of 130kb/s with dropdowns at minimum of 70kb/s

My space is on server called SURT and I tested it on there too and received the same result.
FTP upload of the same file was at the rate of ~40kb/s

I dont know how you can get such a good speeds. I have a great internet connection at my faculty here in Serbia and I can go up to 3MB/s for DL.

Well the speed is not so important as the server stability is for me... If the speed is average, and the server is stable and I dont have problems I'm happy. I dont want speedy server that doesnt work well when its most needed.

Offline salva85

  • Spacescooter Operator
  • *****
  • Posts: 36
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #72 on: March 21, 2007, 11:37:54 AM »
My download test is 60kB7sec, but i have a 300kB/sec conexion. (I download with emule and others programs at 250-300kB/sec).

I'm from spain, in us is more high?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2007, 11:43:28 AM by salva85 »

Offline lasvegasrider

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #73 on: March 25, 2007, 06:56:16 PM »
 :shades:

The 50MB file took under a minute to transfer each of the 4 times I tested it over this weekend.:yey:


Offline erik__

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Testing Lunarpages download speed.
« Reply #74 on: March 31, 2007, 07:44:10 AM »
That is unbelievably slow.. I get like 50k/sec.. I can send with my adsl modem with 5x that speed. I was just about to sign up with your site but.. wow thats slow.. I didn't even know you could get that slow speeds from any server in the western world anymore.
Is this really the speed I would get from my site if I buy your hosting, or is this just for the particular user hosting that speed test?
Don't mean to be overly rude, but even if I had so many users that there were like 10 simultaneous downloads constantly 24/7 the monthtly advertised bandwidth wouldn't be reached for 2 months..
I live in Sweden, and I have three downloads going right now, from microsoft.com and apple.com at 400k each, and your speed test at 50k, the same if I cancel the others and only run yours.. I've tracerouted them and your site actually have the least hops.. the hops are the same in Europe and only changes when they get to the USA where you have 3 hops to your site and the others have like 5 or 6.
It's obviously your server too that doesn't give each connection enough bandwidth since a download manager with 10 connections gives me 400k/sec.

 

Share |